Saturday, May 26, 2007

Writer's Block with a Capital W

Please read these two articles first:
1. At a Loss for Words (Article by Michael Anderson. Via Professor Zero.)
2. No More Lily-White Futures and Monochrome Myths (Article by N.K. Jemison at ABW).

(EDIT: I'm overwhelmed by the many ideas in the articles. From all those threads, I'm picking out writer's block as something that speaks to me.)

So. Ralph Ellison. One celebrated novel and then, what, forty years of near silence? Talk about writer's block!

I've read Invisible Man, in which Ellison did address a lot of problems with mainstream U.S. culture. I don't know much about Ellison's life. But personally I think I have followed something like the path of appeasement of the mainstream U.S. culture that Anderson attributes to Ellison after the publication of Invisible Man. And I've been badly blocked myself. Until lately, I never realized that there might have been a connection between those two things. Recently I've gotten off that path of appeasement, and the block has receded amazingly so far.

It reminds me of a story. In the 1970s, John Varley, a white science-fiction writer, wrote The Ophiuchi Hotline. In Varley's story, a race of creatures have survived for millions of years in the antiseptic environment of artificial habitats in deep space. They can meet their own material needs, change their DNA, etc. -- but they can't maintain their closed culture indefinitely. They would die out if they stopped finding and internalizing other cultures. One big difference between U.S. mainstream culture and Varley's space aliens: the aliens knew that fact.

Most of the white American writers I'm familiar with seem to suffer from alienation. While the writers may know it, they're still totally helpless against it. It's useless to even go to most white American writers for help with alienation. Everybody complains about it but nobody does anything about it! (There are exceptions. I think Vonnegut tried to do something about it. He made it pretty clear that what's wrong with the culture is its immorality. And by immorality he meant things like killing people. Not hiphop music or tattoos or gay sex.)

So. N.K. Jemison's article about racism in science fiction. SF seems to be dying. (EDIT: I don't want to pick on Varley, a brilliantly original man who wrote some of my favorite stories. But he seems to be writing about like woolly mammoths now.) And SF continues to reject writers from outside the mainstream culture. I doubt that the folks inside mainstream SF see a connection between those two things. But a closed culture is a dead culture.

Imagine what SF might look like in ten years ... if it would only unplug its tender pink ears and listen to people who have something new to say? I think the patient can be revived, made stronger than ever. But only if he will let the doctors reach out to him, stop treating them as if they were asking him for a favor, and listen.

It's only SF. Unfortunately U.S. mainstream culture as a whole seems to have a similar problem.

(EDIT: A note of hope. Looking around the blog-neighborhood, I wonder whether we might be in a time like the beginning of the civil rights movement. The culture may be in for some new ideas after all.)

(EEDIT: Plus, Jesus Christ, it's science fiction! We say we want to talk to Dolphins, to creatures from Betelgeuse; we claim we need to liberate the Artificial Intelligences. But we can't take the baby step of reading books written by human beings on our own planet, living ten blocks away, living next door, who have had a different experience? WHAT science fiction? How did it even last this long?)


EDIT: Acknowledgement
Afrofuturism ideas and links at ebogjonson helped me think about this.

EDIT: Belated Acknowledgement 5/31/07
I was also reading Professor Zero on writing and blockage at the time I wrote this.

8 comments:

Professor Zero said...

Wow - mainstream appeasement and block, that explains a lot of the problems *I* have had over the years!

Tom said...

Wait, how much of this is just lifted from your site?? Because I've been reading your stuff about writing and blockage too, and it all goes into the pot, and it's hard to sort the flavors out afterward.

(EDIT: I guess most of us appease the mainstream a lot and most of us get blocked a lot. It's hard to say about causality! Except, for me, reading these blogs and getting dramatically unblocked did coincide.)

Unsane said...

In my various years on the internet, I have found an amazing and powerful rejection of anything that is written to far out of the scope of popular consciousness. Of course, I was naive about this, initially. I came from a cultural perspective which said that education -- and education alone -- was the key to social success. However, the thing with education is that it puts you beyond the reach of popular consciousness. You actually need to progress to yet another stage before you have enough insight to reach back to popular consciousness again, and understand where it is coming from. So, it was that I was very suprised to encounter a revelation one day -- actually it was in the form of an attack, which is the most common guise for revelations nowadays. This person was attacking me for using terms which were not mutually recognisable -- not even, apparently, on an intuitive basis (which I would have been inclined to think possible). But rather than understanding that he was attacking me for using terms not mutually recognisable, he understood that he was attacking me for employing ideas which had no basis in reality. This mistake of his was my revelation! I realised that his idea of reality was completely naive and completely wrong. I couldn't believe that I had so vastly underestimated him, as I had. It really bought it home to me how I an assume so much that is good and wise about the person I am talking to, simply because they have not opened their mouths enough yet. So, I was very silent after that attack -- and he probably concluded that he had shamed me and defeated me, but actually, I'd lost all the respect for him that I had previously had. (It is amazing how often this kind of experience happens to me!)

Tom said...

Unsane, wow. I'm still processing that.

My own "academic credentials" are in a technical field. So in an important sense I basically have little education beyond high school. I'm just realizing that. Three weeks ago I imagined that I was highly educated.

Tom said...

So I guess any mention of dissertations still makes me a little "defense-ive!" Lemme try to poke at my crude argument a little.

For me this dramatic unblocking happened after meeting this particular group of people online. That's probably the immediate reason.

Except that brings me back to the first question I asked Sylvia when I found this neighborhood. Which is, sort of, why is this part of the web green and growing while so much of the online planet seems very arid? (To me, at least.)

The IQ factor is high here, sure, but that's not it. I've read a lot of very smart bloggers who still rewrite Fark very, very often. As I used to.

Opposition to aspects of mainstream U.S. culture is one big difference between this community and the others I've looked at.

I used to try reading a bunch of U.K. humor blogs. Mostly what we would call "liberal" in the U.S. I guess. Anyway in the past two years those guys have gone from (a) comparing beheading to carpet bombing and siding with the bombers to (b) "wait a minute, the U.S. doesn't give a crap about us!" There may be more letters to go after (b), but it's a shift. People are a little hostile to USoids in the comments, which, ok! Finally!

During the same period those blogs did become more readable to me. It keeps coming to me in a parody of a right-wing shock-headline : "U.K. Becoming Less White?" To me those blogs have. What a relief.

Jon said...

There is some progress in Science Fiction. I am thinking of Nalo Hopkins excellent novels and the compilation he edited "Mojo". Another name that comes to mind is China Mieville who has realistic gay characters in his stories.

Unfortunately, SF has gone from being a genre for people who seek the unexpected, to being a genre for people who seek the familiar.

There were a couple of SF writers of the '70's who did a lot to challenge the heroic (and white) space jockey image. I'm thinking of Ursula Leguin, who used non white characters as protagonists and Samuel Delany whose characters were often non-white and or members of sexual minorities.

I don't feel competent to comment on the writer's block/mainstream appeasement stuff. I'm going to think about it.

I found your blog through the Unapologetic Mexican blog. I'm a white man. I've been an anti-racist for a long time, but I feel like my consciousness expanded dramatically when I started reading whiteness studies. I like what you are doing here.

Tom said...

:) thanks for your comment, and for the compliment, Jon! It means a lot.

Interesting parallels.

In an earlier and much longer draft I mentioned both LeGuin and Delany in the post. But, as you say, the 1970s were a different time.

For LeGuin I was thinking especially of her ironic story "The Pathways of Desire" in The Compass Rose. Her scientist Ramchandra slowly discovers, to his dismay, that he is living in the wish-fulfillment fantasies of an adolescent boy. (Uh oh.)

And Delany went through my mind too, not only for both reasons you mentioned, but also for his Cultural Fugue, which reminds me of, well, of the theme of the post.

I will put Hopkins and Mieville on my reading list, thanks.

I only started working actively on anti-racism a matter of weeks ago. One of the most exciting things is how fast my reading list has been growing.

Take care

Unsane said...

Different perspectives are good, because, if they are lived perspectives, then they come from people with courage enough to tell you how their own lives have differed from those that ideology tells us are the only sorts of lives there are.